Template:Xbox 360 NAND Flashers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Most of these flashers have signed drives available, so it's not much of a Pro. Updated the information about the PicoFlasher) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Reads NAND fast in 40 seconds to 4 minutes | *Reads NAND fast in 40 seconds to 4 minutes | ||
*Can also program glitch chips | *Can also program glitch chips | ||
*One of four options for 4GB | *One of four options for 4GB NANDs | ||
*Actively supported | *Actively supported | ||
*USB-C | *USB-C | ||
| | | | ||
*Most expensive flasher | *Most expensive flasher | ||
*Not sold on common marketplaces like Amazon or AliExpress | |||
*Can't be used for flashing Sonus Sounds | *Can't be used for flashing Sonus Sounds | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
| | | | ||
*Reads NAND fast in 1-8 minutes | *Reads NAND fast in 1-8 minutes | ||
*One of four options for 4GB | *One of four options for 4GB NANDs | ||
*One of the two options for Sonus | *One of the two options for [[Xbox 360:Sonus 360|Sonus]] flashing | ||
*Super cheap | *Super cheap | ||
*Easy to find | *Easy to find | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
| | | | ||
*Wire routing is more sensitive compared to other NAND flashers | *Wire routing is more sensitive compared to other NAND flashers | ||
*Tends to have spotty reliability on Xbox 360 motherboards due to their SPI and eMMC logic being up to 5v, whereas the Pico uses 3v. | *Tends to have spotty reliability on Xbox 360 motherboards due to their SPI and eMMC logic being up to 5v, whereas the Pico uses 3.3v. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''[[Xbox_360:JR_Programmer|JR Programmer]]''' | |'''[[Xbox_360:JR_Programmer|JR Programmer]]''' | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
*Reads NAND in 3-10 minutes | *Reads NAND in 3-10 minutes | ||
*Can also program glitch chips | *Can also program glitch chips | ||
*One of the two options for Sonus | *One of the two options for [[Xbox 360:Sonus 360|Sonus]] flashing | ||
*Cheap | *Cheap | ||
*Easy to find | *Easy to find | ||
Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
| | | | ||
*Cheap | *Cheap | ||
| | | | ||
*Requires PC with a native parallel port and more equipment | *Requires PC with a native parallel port and more equipment | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
*Does not support 4GB NANDs | *Does not support 4GB NANDs | ||
*Can’t be used for programming glitch chips | *Can’t be used for programming glitch chips | ||
*Can't be used for flashing | *Can't be used for Sonus flashing | ||
*Takes 30-150 minutes to read NANDs | *Takes 30-150 minutes to read NANDs | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 18:54, 26 June 2024
There are a few different tools for reading your NAND chip: xFlasher 360, Nand-X, JR Programmer, Matrix USB NAND Flasher, PicoFlasher, various SD card tools, or a LPT cable. Consider the pros and cons below and choose the method that’s right for you. An LPT cable is not recommended as it's extremely slow, requires more work than other options, and cannot be used to program glitch chips.
A guide on how to dump and write to a standard NAND can be found here.
Device | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
xFlasher 360 |
|
|
PicoFlasher |
|
|
JR Programmer |
|
|
Nand-X |
|
|
Matrix USB NAND Flasher |
|
|
LPT Cable |
|
|